A critical out-of-bounds write vulnerability has been discovered in WatchGuard Fireware. Tracked as CVE-2025-9242, this flaw allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on affected devices, potentially leading to a complete system compromise.
Business impact
Successful exploitation could result in attackers gaining full control of network perimeter security devices, enabling them to intercept traffic, pivot into internal networks, and exfiltrate sensitive data. This poses a severe risk to network integrity and data confidentiality.
Recommended action
Immediately apply the patches released by WatchGuard. Monitor firewall and VPN logs for any anomalous connection attempts or unexpected behavior from the devices. Activate incident response protocols if compromise is suspected.
Threat actors are actively exploiting a recently disclosed vulnerability in Cisco IOS and IOS XE Software. In a campaign dubbed 'Operation Zero Disco', attackers are leveraging the SNMP flaw to deploy sophisticated Linux rootkits on unpatched, older systems, enabling persistent and stealthy access.
Business impact
Compromised network infrastructure can lead to widespread network outages, data interception, and a persistent foothold for attackers to launch further attacks. The deployment of rootkits makes detection and remediation exceptionally difficult, posing a long-term risk to the organization.
Recommended action
Prioritize patching all vulnerable Cisco IOS and IOS XE devices immediately. Network administrators should scan for indicators of compromise associated with the 'Zero Disco' campaign and consider restricting SNMP access from untrusted networks.
The peer-to-peer lending platform Prosper has reported a massive data breach affecting over 17.6 million users. Attackers successfully exfiltrated a significant volume of personal data, including names, identification details, and sensitive financial information.
Business impact
This breach carries severe financial, reputational, and regulatory consequences. The company faces significant fines under GDPR, potential class-action lawsuits, and a loss of customer trust. Affected individuals are at high risk of identity theft and financial fraud.
Recommended action
Prosper users should immediately change their passwords, enable multi-factor authentication, and monitor their financial accounts for suspicious activity. Organizations should use this as a case study to review their own data protection and incident response strategies.
A new phishing campaign is distributing a previously unknown .NET malware named 'CAPI Backdoor'. The attacks, which target the Russian automotive and e-commerce industries, begin with phishing emails containing malicious ZIP archives that deploy the backdoor.
Business impact
The CAPI Backdoor provides attackers with persistent access to compromised systems, allowing for data exfiltration, lateral movement, and the deployment of additional malware like ransomware. This poses a direct threat to intellectual property and operational continuity in the targeted sectors.
Recommended action
Enhance email security filters to block malicious ZIP attachments. Educate employees on identifying and reporting phishing attempts. Deploy endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions to detect and block the execution of novel .NET malware.
The AdaptixC2 post-exploitation framework, an alternative to Cobalt Strike, is now being distributed through the npm package manager. This represents a significant shift in tactics, leveraging the software supply chain to compromise developer environments and build systems.
Business impact
Malicious npm packages can infect CI/CD pipelines and developer workstations, leading to compromised software builds, stolen credentials, and widespread internal compromise. This supply chain attack vector is difficult to detect and can have a cascading effect on an organization's products and customers.
Recommended action
Implement strict controls and scanning for all third-party packages used in development. Use tools that analyze package behavior and reputation. Restrict permissions for build processes to limit the potential impact of a compromised package.
According to Microsoft, nation-state actors from Russia and China are increasingly leveraging Artificial Intelligence to enhance the speed, scale, and sophistication of their cyberattacks against U.S. targets. This includes using AI for reconnaissance, crafting more convincing phishing lures, and automating exploit development.
Business impact
AI-driven attacks can bypass traditional security defenses more effectively, reduce the time from initial access to impact, and increase the overall volume of threats. This trend requires a strategic shift towards AI-powered defensive mechanisms and more advanced threat detection capabilities.
Recommended action
Security leaders should evaluate and invest in AI- and ML-driven security platforms for threat detection and response. Enhance security awareness training to address the new wave of sophisticated, AI-generated social engineering attacks.
The adoption of AI agents introduces complex security challenges that fall into a shared responsibility model, similar to cloud services. However, both cybersecurity teams and end-users often lack awareness of the risks, such as data poisoning, prompt injection, and unauthorized agent actions.
Business impact
Mismanagement of AI agent security can lead to sensitive data leakage, execution of malicious actions on behalf of a user, and reputational damage. A lack of clear ownership over agent security creates dangerous gaps in an organization's defense.
Recommended action
Establish a clear governance framework for the development and deployment of AI agents. Define security responsibilities for developers, security teams, and business users. Implement robust logging, monitoring, and access controls for all agentic services.
As organizations increasingly rely on data to drive business decisions, the challenge of protecting that data has grown exponentially. A comprehensive data protection strategy is no longer optional but a fundamental requirement for mitigating risk, ensuring business continuity, and meeting regulatory obligations like GDPR. This strategy must encompass not just technology, but also processes and people to be effective against modern threats, as highlighted by the recent 17.6M record breach at Prosper.
Spotlight Rationale: Today's intelligence highlights the increasing complexity of securing modern infrastructure, from nation-state AI attacks to vulnerabilities in network devices ([CVE-2025-9242](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-9242)) and the emerging risks of AI service APIs. Proactively securing these new technology stacks is paramount.
Platform Focus: Amazon Web Services (AWS) Identity and Access Management (IAM) and AWS CloudTrail
AWS provides detailed guidance on securing Amazon Bedrock, its generative AI service. The focus is on managing API keys, which are a primary target for attackers seeking to abuse powerful and potentially costly AI services. By implementing a defense-in-depth strategy using native AWS tools like IAM and CloudTrail, organizations can enforce least-privilege access, monitor for abuse, and reduce the attack surface of their AI deployments.
Actionable Platform Guidance: Organizations using Amazon Bedrock should immediately review and implement AWS's best practices. This includes using IAM roles with temporary credentials instead of long-lived API keys, scoping IAM policies with strict, resource-specific permissions, enabling CloudTrail logging for all Bedrock API calls to detect anomalous activity, and setting up billing alerts to identify potential misuse.
⚠️ Disclaimer: Test all detection logic in non-production environments before deployment.
1. Vendor Platform Configuration - AWS IAM Policy for Bedrock
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": "bedrock:InvokeModel",
"Resource": "arn:aws:bedrock:us-east-1::foundation-model/anthropic.claude-v2",
"Comment": "Allow invoking only the specific Claude v2 model needed by the application."
},
{
"Effect": "Deny",
"Action": "bedrock:*",
"Resource": "*",
"Condition": {
"StringNotEquals": {
"aws:SourceIp": [
"192.0.2.0/24",
"203.0.113.0/24"
]
}
},
"Comment": "Deny all Bedrock actions if the request does not originate from a trusted IP range."
}
]
}
2. YARA Rule for AdaptixC2 Post-Exploitation Framework
rule Detect_AdaptixC2_Framework {
meta:
description = "Detects potential artifacts of the AdaptixC2 post-exploitation framework, often delivered via npm."
author = "Threat Rundown"
date = "2025-10-18"
reference = "https://kasperskycontenthub.com/securelist/?p=117784"
severity = "high"
tlp = "white"
strings:
$s1 = "AdaptixC2"
$s2 = "Adaptix.Connector.dll"
$s3 = "get_task_output"
$s4 = "Initializing C2 channel"
condition:
uint16(0) == 0x5a4d and any of them
}
index=firewall sourcetype="watchguard_logs" (action=allowed OR action=denied)
| stats count by src_ip, dest_port
| where dest_port IN (4117, 4118) AND count > 50
| `comment("Looks for anomalous spikes in connection attempts to WatchGuard management/VPN ports that could indicate scanning or exploitation for CVE-2025-9242.")`
| join src_ip [
search index=proxy earliest=-5m
| `comment("Correlates with subsequent outbound C2 traffic from the firewall's IP if compromised.")`
| rename src_ip as firewall_ip, dest_ip as potential_c2
| fields firewall_ip, potential_c2
]
| table src_ip, dest_port, count, potential_c2
4. PowerShell Script — Hunt for CAPI Backdoor Indicators
# Hunts for potential indicators of the CAPI Backdoor (.NET malware)
$userProfiles = Get-ChildItem "C:\Users" -Directory
$searchPaths = @("\AppData\Local\Temp", "\AppData\Roaming")
foreach ($profile in $userProfiles) {
foreach ($path in $searchPaths) {
$fullPath = $profile.FullName + $path
if (Test-Path $fullPath) {
Write-Host "[*] Searching in $fullPath..."
# Look for recently created .NET assemblies (DLL/EXE) that are not signed by Microsoft
Get-ChildItem -Path $fullPath -Include *.dll, *.exe -Recurse -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue | ForEach-Object {
if ((Get-Date).AddDays(-7) -lt $_.CreationTime) {
$signature = Get-AuthenticodeSignature -FilePath $_.FullName -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
if ($signature.SignerCertificate.Subject -notmatch "Microsoft") {
Write-Warning "[!] Suspicious unsigned .NET file found: $($_.FullName) | Created: $($_.CreationTime)"
}
}
}
}
}
}
This rundown should provide a solid overview of the current threat landscape. Thank you to all our cyberheroes for your diligence and hard work. Stay vigilant!
Cookie Notice
We use essential cookies to provide our cybersecurity newsletter service and analytics cookies to improve your experience. We respect your privacy and comply with GDPR requirements.
About STIX 2.1: Structured Threat Information eXpression (STIX) is the machine language of cybersecurity. This bundle contains validated threat objects, indicators, and relationships that can be directly imported into your SIEM, TIP, or security orchestration platform.
Usage: Download or copy the JSON below and import it directly into your threat intelligence platform, SIEM, or security orchestration tools for automated threat detection and response.
CRITICAL ITEMS
HIGH SEVERITY ITEMS
EXECUTIVE INSIGHTS
VENDOR SPOTLIGHT
DETECTION & RESPONSE KIT